Latest news, insights & updates

Fire Door Compliance After the Fire Safety Act: What’s Changed?

8 fire safey act what's changed

Fire door compliance has moved much higher up the agenda in recent years, but many building managers are still unclear about what actually changed in law and what those changes mean in practice. The confusion is understandable. The Fire Safety Act 2021, the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022, and the wider post-Grenfell focus on building safety are closely linked, yet they are not the same thing.

For responsible persons, estate managers, housing providers, and organisations with complex or mixed-use property portfolios, the key point is this: fire doors now receive far greater legal and practical scrutiny than before. In particular, the scope of the fire risk assessment for certain multi-occupied residential buildings was clarified to include flat entrance doors and elements of the building that had historically been treated less consistently. The 2022 Regulations then introduced additional duties around inspection, information sharing, and record keeping in England.

That does not mean every building falls under the same fire door regime. It does mean dutyholders need to be much clearer about which buildings are affected, what must be checked, and how defects are identified, prioritised, and put right.

Why has fire door compliance become such a major issue?

Fire doors are a critical part of compartmentation. When they work properly, they help contain fire and smoke, protect escape routes, and buy valuable time for occupants to evacuate or for other fire strategies to operate as intended. When they fail, the consequences can be severe.

The legal focus increased because past practice was not always consistent. In some buildings, flat entrance doors and external wall issues were not being considered clearly enough within fire risk assessments. The Fire Safety Act was introduced to remove that ambiguity. In simple terms, it clarified that for buildings containing two or more sets of domestic premises, the Fire Safety Order applies to the building’s structure, external walls, and the doors between domestic premises and common parts. That includes relevant flat entrance doors.

For building managers, the result is a stronger expectation that fire doors are not just installed once and forgotten. They need to be understood as active safety components that require inspection, maintenance, documentation, and, where necessary, remediation.

What did the Fire Safety Act actually change?

One of the most common misunderstandings is that the Fire Safety Act created an entirely new fire safety system. It did not. Instead, it clarified the scope of the existing Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 in relation to certain residential buildings.

The Act applies where a building contains two or more sets of domestic premises. In those cases, the Responsible Person must take account of the building’s structure, external walls, and all doors between domestic premises and common parts when carrying out fire risk assessments and managing fire risk.

That point matters enormously for fire doors. Before the clarification, there could be uncertainty about whether flat entrance doors fell within the scope of duties under the Fire Safety Order. The Act removed that uncertainty. If those doors form part of the protection between a flat and the common parts, they need to be treated as part of the wider fire safety picture.

How is the Fire Safety Act different from the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022?

The Fire Safety Act and the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 are related, but they do different jobs.

The Fire Safety Act clarified what sits within the scope of the Fire Safety Order for buildings containing two or more domestic premises. It answered the question of what must be considered.

The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 then introduced specific additional duties for Responsible Persons in England, particularly for multi-occupied residential buildings and, in some cases, higher-rise residential buildings. Those duties include providing information to residents, giving fire and rescue services information relevant to the building, and carrying out checks on fire doors in certain taller buildings.

In practice, the Act set the legal foundation, while the 2022 Regulations added more detailed operational expectations. If a building manager talks only about the Fire Safety Act but ignores the 2022 Regulations, they may miss the day-to-day duties that actually drive inspection and compliance activity.

What are the current legal expectations for fire doors?

The current expectation is not simply that a building has fire doors. It is that the Responsible Person understands whether those doors are suitable, whether they remain in effective working order, and whether the fire risk assessment properly reflects their condition and role in the building’s fire strategy.

That means checking far more than whether a door carries a label or looks substantial. Fire door compliance is about the whole assembly and how it performs in real use. Gaps, damaged seals, non-compliant glazing, missing ironmongery, failed self-closers, poor frame condition, unauthorised alterations, and hold-open arrangements can all undermine performance.

Routine checks and more formal inspections should therefore be planned, not left to chance. Where defects are identified, the compliance burden does not end with a survey report. Dutyholders also need a clear remediation process, a record of actions taken, and a way to demonstrate that high-risk issues have been prioritised.

What are the specific requirements for taller residential buildings?

The most widely discussed fire door duties under the 2022 Regulations apply to multi-occupied residential buildings in England above 11 metres in height.

In those buildings, Responsible Persons must undertake quarterly checks of all fire doors in the common parts, as far as is reasonably practicable. They must also use best endeavours to carry out checks of flat entrance doors at least every 12 months.

The phrase best endeavours is important. It recognises that access to individual flats may not always be straightforward, but it does not remove the duty to make genuine, documented efforts. That means having a clear access process, communicating with residents, keeping records of contact attempts, and returning where checks could not be completed at the first attempt.

The Regulations also require Responsible Persons to provide residents with information about fire doors, including the importance of keeping them shut when not in use, not tampering with self-closing devices, and reporting faults promptly. Compliance is therefore not only about inspection; it is also about resident awareness and practical management.

What does this mean for mixed-use and complex estates?

For many organisations, especially those managing large portfolios, the challenge is not simply understanding the law. It is applying it consistently across buildings with different heights, uses, occupancies, and ownership structures.

A mixed-use block may include residential accommodation above commercial premises, while a public sector estate may contain student or key-worker housing alongside teaching, healthcare, or office spaces. In all of these settings, fire door compliance can become fragmented unless there is a structured programme behind it.

Surveys alone are not enough. A responsible person may commission a fire door inspection and still remain exposed if defects are not categorised properly, remedial works are delayed, records are incomplete, or follow-up checks are inconsistent.

What are the most common compliance gaps after the Fire Safety Act?

One common gap is assuming that the legal change only affects very tall buildings. In reality, the Fire Safety Act clarification is wider than the specific inspection frequencies in the 2022 Regulations. Dutyholders still need to understand which fire doors fall within scope and how those doors contribute to the fire strategy.

Another gap is focusing only on flat entrance doors while neglecting communal doors and other elements of compartmentation that may be critical in an incident. Poor record keeping is another recurring weakness. If a building manager cannot show what was inspected, when it was inspected, what defects were found, and what action followed, it becomes much harder to demonstrate a robust compliance position.

There is also the issue of remediation. Many fire door reports identify defects, but the process stalls when budgets, access constraints, procurement delays, or unclear responsibility get in the way. From a compliance perspective, finding a defect is only the start. What matters is whether the defect is assessed properly and resolved within an appropriate timeframe.

How should responsible persons respond now?

The most effective response is to treat fire door compliance as an ongoing management programme rather than a one-off exercise triggered by legislation. Responsible Persons should begin by confirming which buildings and door sets fall within scope, how their fire risk assessments address those doors, and whether current inspection arrangements meet the duties that apply.

From there, the practical priorities are clear: establish regular checks, commission competent inspections, keep detailed records, communicate with occupants where required, and put remediation plans in place for identified defects. Where portfolios are large or technically demanding, specialist support can make a significant difference by creating a consistent process across surveys, reporting, repairs, and evidence of compliance.

For organisations operating across London and the South East, this is often where an integrated provider adds value. Fire door surveys, remedial works, and ongoing compliance support are much easier to manage when they are linked together rather than handled through disconnected suppliers and spreadsheets.

Conclusion

So, what changed after the Fire Safety Act? The biggest shift is clarity, accountability, and scrutiny.

The Fire Safety Act 2021 clarified that, in buildings containing two or more sets of domestic premises, the Fire Safety Order applies to structure, external walls, and relevant flat entrance doors. The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 then added more specific operational duties, including regular checks of communal fire doors and annual best-endeavours checks of flat entrance doors in taller residential buildings.

For building managers, the practical lesson is that fire door compliance is no longer something that can sit in the background. It needs to be visible, documented, and actively managed. That means understanding which duties apply, ensuring inspections are competent and regular, and making sure defects lead to timely remediation rather than simply another report on file.

Done properly, this approach does more than satisfy a legal requirement. It strengthens compartmentation, supports the wider fire strategy, and gives Responsible Persons a clearer and more defensible compliance position.

 | 

Call Us: 0208 300 9996

 | 

ECS Systems Limited, 75 Station Rd, Sidcup DA15 7DN

Follow Us |

 | 

 | 

 | 

ECS Systems Limited, 75 Station Rd, Sidcup DA15 7DN

 | 

 | 

 | 

 | 

If you’d like to learn more about ECS Systems or the services we offer, please get in touch: